• home
  • portfolio
  • about
Menu

FitzFolio

  • home
  • portfolio
  • about
×

For most of my career, thinking was something you did on the way to a deliverable. Buried in the hours. Billed as “strategy,” if at all.

Then the job got bigger. Channels multiplied. Customers started meeting brands everywhere, from the app to the hold music. The ad became one chapter in a story the whole company writes, and creative thinking moved from the edit suite into the boardroom. AI finishes the job. Making things is now nearly free. Deciding what’s worth making is the work.
That’s what I write about here.

Read a few.
If one sounds like the problem on your desk, let’s talk.

narrative.


all the way down.

Bob Fitzgerald May 4, 2026

I came of age as a creative director during my years working at Arnold in Boston. It was there I learned, amongst other things, that there was more to our end of the business than just a great idea. That clients bought as much into the people as the idea they were presenting. And that even a perfectly self-evident brilliant idea still needed a story behind it to sell.

Another way of thinking about it would be that in addition to the “what” of the big idea one had to sell the “who” the people whose idea it was and the “why” reason it is a good idea in order to really get people to buy in.

I mention my time at Arnold because I was there in the heyday of their great and powerful ‘brand essence’ movement. Led by Fran Kelly, embodied in the VW work, and central to just about every new business pitch, strategy doc or even elevator conversation we were the agency of BRAND ESSENCE. And it worked. It was wildly successful.

At the heart of it all was the idea that brands have a rational meaning and an emotional meaning in the lives of consumers. Like in VW it was rational – affordable German engineering – and emotional – ‘drivers wanted’ with a very psychologically loaded definition of what who and what a driver is.

Brand Essence was the Kool-Aid they were serving and I drank deeply of it. But in the back of my mind I always had an unspoken, and probably heretical, idea about the rational/emotional framework. At some point, I realized that the rational part of the equation was there to sell the client on the idea and the emotional was truly the means of connection our work provided between our clients and their consumers.

I believe that the current focus on story and narrative are an affirmation of my earlier thinking. No one I’ve ever known has found a braggart convincing, appealing or even tolerable.

Furthermore, people are irrational. They don’t live their lives based on facts. Our feelings and emotions are at the heart of our decisions. Looking at your own life can probably prove this true to you but if not there are numerous books to turn to. Dan Ariely’s Predictably Irrational, Daniel Kahneman's Thinking Fast and Slow and most recently Robert McKee and Tom Gerace’s Stroynomics.

People like to like the things that are in their lives. Stories help them do that. Facts, not so much. Facts can help us rationalize why we like something but they’re not great at making people actually feel anything.

Back when TV ruled and commercials could interrupt people’s lives, stuffing communications with facts brought some effect. But even then, commercials that actually told stories were the ones that really made a difference.

And today with endless channels of communication, ad blocking, social sharing and all that, most marketers don’t even have the means to force feed a bunch of facts to anyone.

Story is the way. Emotional connection is the means. And although the state of things today have made understanding this imperative, it has always, always been the truth. 

← →

Search Posts

No results found

the big big idea

AI has made creative capacity almost unlimited.

It can research, write, design, produce, test, adapt and try again at a scale no creative person could match. It can help a brand remember what it has learned, find patterns in what people say and do, explore ideas once too expensive to pursue and turn one story into a thousand expressions.

That changes the economics of creativity. It changes where brands can be managed, how ideas are developed, how stories travel and how precisely communication can be shaped around the person receiving it.

But capacity is not direction.

More ideas do not tell us which idea is good. More data does not explain the person behind the click. More fluent content does not make a brand memorable. A story can spread without being true, coherent or worth believing.

Someone still has to know what we are trying to say. What a brand can credibly own. What people might feel, remember, repeat and do. What is merely clever and what is actually true. What to pursue. What to protect. What to keep working on.

And which idea is the one.

AI has made almost anything possible.

Which makes knowing what to do with it the whole job.

Bob Fitzgerald - 617-835-9655 - bobfitzgerald@me.com Powered by Squarespace